SiteMap of SciRealm | About John | Send email to JohnJohn's Science, Math, Philosophy Stuff: |
4-Vectors |
Ambigrams |
Antipodes |
Covert Ops Fragments |
Cyrillic Projector |
Forced Induction (Sums Of Powers Of Integers) |
Frontiers |
IFS Fractals |
JavaScript Graphics |
JavaScript Graphics Using Table |
Kid Science |
Kryptos |
Photography |
Prime Sieve |
QM from SR |
QM from SR-Simple RoadMap |
Quantum Phase |
Quotes |
RuneQuest Cipher Challenge |
Secret Codes & Ciphers |
Scientific Calculator |
Science+Math |
Sci-Pan Pantheist Poems |
Stereograms |
Turkish Grammar
The Science Realm: John's Virtual Sci-Tech Universe |
May the treasures buried herein spark the fires of imagination like the twinkling jewels of celestial light crowning the midnight sky...
Quantum Mechanics is derivable from Special Relativity
See QM from SR-Simple RoadMap
***Learn, Discover, Explore***
Melike Wilson Art
Site last modified: 2015-Apr-25 |

Note: This is a work in progress...if you notice errors, please let me know.

QM=Quantum Mechanics

SR=Special Relativity

GR=General Relativity

There are still several fundamental problems with the interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Admittedly, it is arguably the most successful theory in all of physics, but there are a number of paradoxical and unintuitive results that occur when the formalism is blindly followed. It is my opinion that QM as currently formulated is not a final theory. I believe that there is a deeper structure which gives QM as a statistical approximation, just as Classical Mechanics is an approximation of QM for systems composed of many particles.

Let's begin with the measurement problem.

A "observed" system makes a discontinuous "jump" into a single eigenstate of the measurement observable. Which of the final states will be selected is currently an unknown and unknowable in standard QM.

However, this system + observer is just a subset of a larger "unobserved" system, which evolves deterministically according to the Schrodinger equation, or more accurately the Klein-Gordon or Dirac equations, its relativistic cousins. Based on this, the device for making a measurement "selection" should reside within the QM formalism, without having to ad hoc in a new "hidden variable".

Everything is made of quantum particles. I do not subscribe to Bohr's artificially drawn line between quantum and classical systems.

I propose that the overall phases of single quantum particles are the devices by which measurement selections are made.

__What are the properties which support this?__

1) QM has been enormously successful over the past years for predicting all kinds of phenomena. Any successor theory must give the same
results within the valid regime of QM. The overall phase does not change the probabilistic predictions of QM.

Let |S> = e^{ia }|s>, then <S|S> = <s|e^{-ia} e^{ia} |s> = <s| e^{-ia+ia} |s> =
<s| e^{0} |s> = <s|s>

Hence, as stated in so many QM books, the overall phase plays no role in the probabilistic predictions of QM. However, this does not rule
out the possibility that the overall phase could play some role in which eigenstate is selected in a measurement process. It simply puts a
condition on the allowed values that the phase might take - it must obey a statistical law if one repeats "identical up to a phase
factor" experiments.

2) The overall phase is a relativistic invariant. Thus, all inertial observers will agree on phase values.

Phi = **K**·**R** = wt - **k**·**r**

Also, this relation gives the phase values as the particle moves through spacetime. Other relativistic invariants include such things as
c-speed of light, m_{0}-rest mass, hbar-Planck's constant, q-electric charge, etc. Note that in the particle's own rest-frame,
the overall phase will change according to wt. Thus the phase is always "spinning" around the time axis. If a particle has a
constant **K**, one can show that:

Phi(**K**=**K**_{0}) = (m_{0}c^{2 }/ hbar) *T* + **K**_{0}·**R**_{0}

This description shows how the phases of separate particles could maintain a phase entanglement. If the particles are of equal rest mass and
if they begin at the same spacetime event point, then their respective phases change at the same rates according to each one's proper time.

3) When one considers free particle scattering theory, the result is that the only change in the wave function at large distances is a
change in the phase of the outgoing wave. Think about this. We are repeating "identical up to a phase factor" experiments with two
particles. We have a target particle at a certain location. We shoot a moving particle at it with the same velocity from the same location
in each setup. QM can not predict the exact outcome of this simple experiment, just the scattering cross-section probabilities. What can
determine the actualized outcome? There is apparently some sort of phase interaction that occurs in the collision. Perhaps the differing
overall initial phases of the particles involved in the same experimental configuration are what account for the different possible outcomes
of the same experiment.

The Science Realm: John's Virtual Sci-Tech UniverseJohn's Science & Math Stuff: | About John | Send email to John4-Vectors | Ambigrams | Antipodes | Covert Ops Fragments | Cyrillic Projector | Forced Induction (Sums Of Powers Of Integers) | Fractals | Frontiers | JavaScript Graphics | Kid Science | Kryptos | Photography | Prime Sieve | QM from SR | QM from SR-Simple RoadMap | Quantum Phase | Quotes | RuneQuest Cipher Challenge | Scientific Calculator | Secret Codes & Ciphers | Science+Math | Sci-Pan Pantheist Poems | Stereograms | Turkish Grammar | |

Quantum Mechanics is derivable from Special RelativitySee QM from SR-Simple RoadMap |